| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Why you should
consider using a spectroradiometer instead of a pod device?
- Aren't Pods Faster? - The pod
tested and its software are sometimes faster and
sometimes slower. Both will slow down on dark
images when you activate the improved accuracy mode in
i1 Pro DCS. A
typical measurement sequence required five more seconds
for the Eye-One Pro than the color analyzer. What
good is fast if it is wrong even if the pod is slightly
faster ?
- Aren't
Pods Better In Low Light? - Maybe if you are not using
i1 Pro DCS, but it is not obvious in any of the data
below when compared to this software. Note the
amazing performance of the Eye-One on the Sony B&W
monitor even at 0.03 fL the values are believable while
the pod is erroneous with an
impossible reading of 0.9
in x.
- Aren't
Pods Acceptable For All Display Types? - You could say
that, but what does that mean. Take a look at the
data below and see if you believe a pod is acceptable.
- Won't
a spectroradiometer miss narrow emission bands? - Look
at the green and red laser pointer data below to see how
the GretagMacbeth i1 Pro responds to these extreme
measurements versus the pod.
- Why
would a spectroradiometer be better than a pod? -
A pod measures light through filters and estimates the
color based on a relatively small number of sensors,
usually three and sometimes a few more. The i1 Pro
uses a holographic diffraction grating with a diode
array (no filters to degrade) similar to what is found
in laboratory grade instruments. The i1 Pro
samples with 100 sensors instead of three and uses the
internationally recognized scientific standard method
from CIE to calculate the x and y coordinates from those
samples. Which do you think is likely to be more
accurate?
|
| |
The following tables compare
measurements made with a GretagMacbeth i1 Pro using the
i1
Pro DCS software with improved low light capabilities (only
available from AccuCal™) versus a popular professional
color analyzer probe. Note the large difference in
foot Lamberts (fL) measured with the rear projection
televisions. The pod does not see the screen gain
and reports a value that is too low.
Note that the pod is reasonable
for the direct view CRT which is what they were used for
historically. ±0.005 in x and y is the target
accuracy for many color calibrators.
Definitions:
- Signal = Input signal
strength to the display.
- x = x coordinate (0 to 1)
in the CIE 1931 color system. The larger the
value the redder the color.
- y = y coordinate (0 to 1)
in the CIE 1931 color system. The larger the
value the greener the color.
- Y = luminance in foot
Lamberts. This is how bright the display is.
|
| |
|
| |
LCD Rear Projection Display Results: |
| |
|
| |
| |
i1 Pro Sensor |
|
|
Popular Pod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signal |
x |
y |
Y,fL |
x |
y |
Y,fL |
diff. x |
diff. y |
% diff. Y |
|
0 |
0.2650 |
0.2518 |
0.159 |
0.2725 |
0.2463 |
0.056 |
0.0075 |
0.0055 |
65% |
|
10 |
0.2682 |
0.2693 |
0.274 |
0.2712 |
0.2627 |
0.0960 |
0.0030 |
0.0066 |
65% |
|
20 |
0.2971 |
0.3020 |
0.785 |
0.2924 |
0.2877 |
0.2170 |
0.0047 |
0.0143 |
72% |
|
30 |
0.3103 |
0.3182 |
1.826 |
0.3025 |
0.3040 |
0.4740 |
0.0078 |
0.0142 |
74% |
|
40 |
0.3177 |
0.3285 |
3.570 |
0.3084 |
0.3129 |
0.8630 |
0.0093 |
0.0156 |
76% |
|
50 |
0.3208 |
0.3315 |
6.055 |
0.3137 |
0.3141 |
1.4450 |
0.0071 |
0.0174 |
76% |
|
60 |
0.3220 |
0.3316 |
9.159 |
0.3152 |
0.3172 |
2.1830 |
0.0068 |
0.0144 |
76% |
|
70 |
0.3220 |
0.3316 |
13.109 |
0.3157 |
0.3168 |
3.1290 |
0.0063 |
0.0148 |
76% |
|
80 |
0.3228 |
0.3336 |
17.891 |
0.3153 |
0.3167 |
4.3320 |
0.0075 |
0.0169 |
76% |
|
90 |
0.3234 |
0.3350 |
23.053 |
0.3162 |
0.3184 |
5.6370 |
0.0072 |
0.0166 |
76% |
|
100 |
0.3241 |
0.3381 |
28.422 |
0.3168 |
0.3195 |
7.1810 |
0.0073 |
0.0186 |
75% |
|
Red |
0.6458 |
0.3269 |
|
0.6433 |
0.3311 |
|
0.0025 |
0.0042 |
|
|
Green |
0.3029 |
0.6689 |
|
0.2845 |
0.6685 |
|
0.0184 |
0.0004 |
|
|
Blue |
0.1491 |
0.0638 |
|
0.1462 |
0.0596 |
|
0.0029 |
0.0042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Absolute |
0.0073 |
0.0126 |
75% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference Excluding 0% & 10% Signal |
|
|
| |
|
| |
LCoS Rear
Projection Display Results: |
| |
|
| |
| |
i1 Pro Sensor |
|
|
Popular Pod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signal |
x |
y |
Y,fL |
x |
y |
Y,fL |
diff. x |
diff. y |
% diff. Y |
|
0 |
0.2757 |
0.2619 |
0.112 |
0.3000 |
0.2562 |
0.04 |
0.0243 |
0.0057 |
64% |
|
10 |
0.2962 |
0.3057 |
1.017 |
0.2683 |
0.3328 |
0.3290 |
0.0279 |
0.0271 |
68% |
|
20 |
0.2930 |
0.3009 |
4.492 |
0.2732 |
0.3055 |
1.4220 |
0.0198 |
0.0046 |
68% |
|
30 |
0.2925 |
0.2998 |
10.453 |
0.2756 |
0.2943 |
3.3850 |
0.0169 |
0.0055 |
68% |
|
40 |
0.2934 |
0.3006 |
19.397 |
0.2772 |
0.2899 |
6.1740 |
0.0162 |
0.0107 |
68% |
|
50 |
0.2925 |
0.2970 |
31.070 |
0.2790 |
0.2880 |
9.9180 |
| |